Support Your Local Dialoge

By Kay Springsteen

In today’s writing, the use of elaborate dialogue tags is discouraged, relegated to the Word Grave Yard along with adjectives and words ending in –ing. As an editor, I’m often asked why. What some writers are asking is: Why can’t an author use “she admonished,” or “he chided” or other words synonymous with “said”?

While these words were acceptable, even encouraged, not so long ago, the advent of engaging readers more fully in the story has changed things. Tools to engage readers include taking them into deep point of view for each character you show PoV, and painting scenes in such a way as to show them in the reader’s mind.

So, what do words such as chided and admonished have to do with this new movement to engage readers? Nothing, which is the point. They have nothing to do with the movement because they do not assist and advance the movement. All dialogue tags are, in effect, telling as opposed to showing. Even “said” and “asked” are telling, but simple and typical dialogue tags are apparently psychologically invisible to readers, and therefore do not get in the way of the story. However, even said should be used sparingly, as a way to orient the reader through initial patches of dialogue or long stretches.

“Blah blah,” he said.

“Blah blah,” she said.

“Blah blah blah.”

“Blah blah.”

“Blah blah blah,” he said.

Another way to show a scene and keep the reader oriented at the same time is to add action beats in place of dialogue tags. Action beats support the dialogue so readers are not presented with what I have come to think of as “talking heads.” In a Hollywood movie or TV show, when two characters are having a discussion, they are not motionless. They use hand gestures, facial expressions, movements such as pacing, leaning against a wall, peeking out a window, etc. To show such actions in a work of written fiction is to keep the scene in motion and show what is going on. It also demonstrates emotions.

Consider the passage:  “Don’t say that,” she pleaded.

We can glean from the word pleaded that she is asking for something and that it is important to her. But what are they doing while she’s asking it? It’s highly unlikely they’re staying still.

Now change it to this:  She pressed two fingers against his lips. “Please, don’t say that.”

Now the scene has motion. It’s not stagnant. Which passage paints the picture? Which one tells a part of the story? Which one shows what is going on? Which one brings the reader to a front row center seat for the performance? Which would you rather read?

Writers must be careful not to employ action beats to support dialogue too frequently or with trite and unimaginative sentences and phrases. He grinned. She smiled. She giggled. These action dialogue tags are tired and while it’s okay to use them very infrequently, I will caution you to be very careful when you do to ensure nothing else will fit in that particular place in your story.

Readers: Do you notice unusual dialogue tags as you’re reading?

Writers: How do you support your dialogue?


11 responses to “Support Your Local Dialoge

  1. Nothing throws me out of a story quicker than ‘He murmured, she exclaimed, he repeated, she spat…” If the dialogue itself is strong enough, it will show me what the character is doing–I don’t need the author to tell me…

    As a writer, I’ll go back in revisions and make sure that my writing is active and that dialogue tags aren’t necessary unless there is more than two speakers.

    Great post Kay!

  2. Great advice, Kay! Super post.

  3. I use dialogue tags when I write, but I tend to use action frequently. I agree it creates a better picture in the mind of the reader. Even in the example you gave above, “she pleaded” alone is not powerful–but it can be enhanced by describing her facial expression or having her clasp her hands together in a prayerful manner, etc.

    Great posts.

  4. I just got finished getting rid of a ton of dialogue tags– wish I’d had this advice before!!

  5. Absolutely, Kay! This is one of the “newbie writer” flags in contests or gets the submission sent to an editor’s circular file. ;-D

  6. Thanks for the post. Very informative.

  7. The only thing I have to say is Great Minds:) Great analogy and examples:)

  8. Excellent post! I read somewhere (I think it was Stephen King on writing) calls the tags lazy writing. Instead of taking that extra step in action to convey to the reader the tone in dialogue, they will slap on a one liner–no action word. I’d rather see and assume the tone than the author intrusion of telling me.
    Thanks so much for your words.

  9. Great post Kay. My problem is with positioning the ‘action tag’ after dialogue. I gather it’s wrong to have it in the same line as speech.

  10. Sherry, no it’s not wrong. I use a combination of in-line and out-of-line with dialogue, depending on how long it is. It’s kind of dependent on the rhythm the writer is striving for. A lot of times I’ll see dialogue broken up by he said/she said and if an action was inserted in that space instead of the “stage direction” of said, the passage is a lot more powerful.

  11. Your example is great! I think it’s always a struggle for writers to accept that they should just use said instead of substituting another word, because repetition is generally not looked on as a good thing, either. But the point that you make nicely is that we shouldn’t be repeating “said” either, but using actions instead or simply letting dialogue stand on its own when it can.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s